TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Ehhh.. no..
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Ehhh.. no..
     
Posted by ZCRZY on March 23, 2005 at 3:06 PM
  This message has been viewed 33 times.
     
In Reply To This should have been the 350Z posted by ranryu on March 23, 2005 at 12:08 PM
     
Message sorry, I do not like it at all. The design is good, it would probably sell, but I personally would not get it.
I do not like the 350 either, but I would go for it if I have to choose.
The front looks good, the headlights look good exept the fact you made a mistake and put the projectors towars the center... they have to be to the sides, and the reflectors (high) to the center. I believe it is a law, not just a trend. I would add also fogs, not for just "fog" but for better lighting.
The side looks ok, but I think both the 300ZX and the 350Z looks better. Is missing some things like air intakes or something to give it more "life" (decorations I would say).
The back looks like a Mustang and also like a Prelude.. Sorry but don't like. The Z has always have a hatch on the back, and that is how I like it, and all the people I know also likes the hatch better for a sports car.
But this is just my opinion ;)

Thanks
Danny

Post Disclaimers (in the words of Glenn Nakata, TT member #5206):

1. Yes this might be a repost – Sorry.
2. No, I did not search to see if someone already
posted it. Do you search prior to every post you make?
3. It might be old news to you, but new news to me and
likely as well for a few others, so just let it slide.
4. It is MHO, which may or may not agree with yours.
5. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and to express it,
though at times it is best to STFU.
6. If you like it, that is all that matters. Don’t worry what
other thinks. Do what you want.
7. Don’t shoot the messenger.
8. Relax and cut everyone a little slack.
9. Why can’t we all get along?
10. Enjoy

www.geocities.com/miamizcarclub

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.